Warning: Humans Cannot Reliably Detect Speech Deepfakes

Authors: Kimberly T. Mai, Sergi D. Bray, Toby Davies, Lewis D. Griffin

Published: 2023-01-19 00:17:48+00:00

AI Summary

This study investigates human capabilities in detecting speech deepfakes through an online experiment involving 529 participants listening to English and Mandarin audio clips. The results show that human detection accuracy is unreliable, reaching only 73% accuracy, with no significant difference between languages; brief familiarization with deepfake examples only marginally improves performance.

Abstract

Speech deepfakes are artificial voices generated by machine learning models. Previous literature has highlighted deepfakes as one of the biggest security threats arising from progress in artificial intelligence due to their potential for misuse. However, studies investigating human detection capabilities are limited. We presented genuine and deepfake audio to n = 529 individuals and asked them to identify the deepfakes. We ran our experiments in English and Mandarin to understand if language affects detection performance and decision-making rationale. We found that detection capability is unreliable. Listeners only correctly spotted the deepfakes 73% of the time, and there was no difference in detectability between the two languages. Increasing listener awareness by providing examples of speech deepfakes only improves results slightly. As speech synthesis algorithms improve and become more realistic, we can expect the detection task to become harder. The difficulty of detecting speech deepfakes confirms their potential for misuse and signals that defenses against this threat are needed.


Key findings
Humans are unreliable at detecting speech deepfakes, achieving only around 73% accuracy. Performance did not differ significantly between English and Mandarin. Providing examples of deepfakes slightly improves detection but not substantially.
Approach
The researchers conducted an online experiment where participants listened to genuine and deepfake audio clips in English and Mandarin. Participants were divided into groups with different task configurations (unary vs. binary comparisons) and familiarization treatments. Performance was measured and analyzed using linear regression and ROC curves.
Datasets
LJSpeech (English), Chinese Standard Mandarin Speech Corpus (CSMSC, Mandarin), FAD (Mandarin - for out-of-domain model training)
Model(s)
Pre-trained VITS models for deepfake generation; LFCC-LCNN architecture for automated deepfake detection.
Author countries
United Kingdom